Re: [boost] boost::function overhead?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-02 12:03:17

"Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:e37oqm$gan$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]> wrote
>
>> I'd like to use boost::function to wrap (pointer to) function to pass to
>> template functions that expect function objects.  I'm just wondering,
>> though, if using boost::function wrapper will introduce additional
> overhead
>> into the function call?
>
> boost::function will introduce an extra virtual function call (which is 
> not
> a big deal in most cases).

Actually it doesn't if I am not mistaken.

Gennadiy