From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-05 13:31:21
Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Would it be possible to already set the HEAD to version 1.35?
> Once the branch for release of a version has been made the head
> automatically should target the next number. Or I am missing something?
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding the general policy. What is the rationale
> for having HEAD and the latest branch for release pointing to the same
> Having different numbers would make it more comfortable having the
> development and release candidates in the same (install) place.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk