Re: [boost] [review] Fusion review begins:extension.htm:why iterator param Struct?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-06 18:25:45

dan marsden <danmarsden_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>However, there's no declaration of example_struct_iterator_tag.  I
>>assume it can just be declared (no need to define it) like
>>the example_sequence_tag occuring just below the section titled:
>
> There's going to be a couple of changes in this example. You are correct
> though that a forward declaration of example_struct_iterator_tag is
> needed, if only to make the docs clearer.

Suggest you leave out "struct_" as it adds little.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com