Re: [boost] [Range] patched: boost/range/iterator.hpp

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 14:09:54

"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Why?  What other changes do you think are needed in order to make this
>> consistent?
>
>
> Because your change is unnecessary (just use range_result_iterator) and 
> because it could potentially break code.
>
>
>> Anyway, now that you've reminded me of range_result_iterator, I'll be
>> happy to roll back my change if this is breaking any code or if
>> Thorsten asks me to.
>
>
> I also object to patching someone else's code without permission unless 
> that person is unreachable, which Thorsten is not. Had you checked 
> first, he (or I) would have simply told you to use range_result_iterator.

Okay, you're right.  My only excuse is a poor one, so I won't even
bother ;-)

Un-patching...

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com