From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 14:09:54
"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Why? What other changes do you think are needed in order to make this
> Because your change is unnecessary (just use range_result_iterator) and
> because it could potentially break code.
>> Anyway, now that you've reminded me of range_result_iterator, I'll be
>> happy to roll back my change if this is breaking any code or if
>> Thorsten asks me to.
> I also object to patching someone else's code without permission unless
> that person is unreachable, which Thorsten is not. Had you checked
> first, he (or I) would have simply told you to use range_result_iterator.
Okay, you're right. My only excuse is a poor one, so I won't even
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk