Re: [boost] [Range] Expected complexity constraints

From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-09 10:38:42

David Abrahams wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>You mean more expensive because you have to see which irerator that is 
>>the valid one?
> 
> 
> The checks are more complicated than that, but that's the general
> idea.
> 
> 
>>In that case it might be reasoable to always mandate the left argument 
>>to be the valid iterator:
> 
> 
> No, that violates EqualityComparable, not to mention every reasonable
> person's expectations.

In that case I think it's not worth doing. I'll leave it up to Pavol to
put it in the string library.

-Thorsten