From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-09 10:38:42
David Abrahams wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>You mean more expensive because you have to see which irerator that is
>>the valid one?
> The checks are more complicated than that, but that's the general
>>In that case it might be reasoable to always mandate the left argument
>>to be the valid iterator:
> No, that violates EqualityComparable, not to mention every reasonable
> person's expectations.
In that case I think it's not worth doing. I'll leave it up to Pavol to
put it in the string library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk