From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-09 21:29:27
> With regard to naming, I think fusion::pair is a bad name. Perhaps it
> should be instead named fusion::keyed? I think the name pair should be
> reserved for two values (std::pair) or two types (mpl::pair). The mixing
> of the two was unexpected.
Yes, I also thought that was a surprising use of the word pair.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk