From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-10 17:10:15
Larry Evans <cppljevans_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On 05/10/2006 03:04 PM, dan marsden wrote:
>> I believe that the position of a fusion iterator must be encoded in
>> the information available at compile. This is needed for fusion sequences
>> to serve as conforming MPL sequences (and probably various other things).
> OK, maybe I misunderstood. I thought that since operator* returns a
> value instead of a type (obviously), that two iterators would be equal
> only when they were the same length and each value returned by operator*
> was equal. Is that not the case?
Do you dereference normal STL iterators inside their comparison operators?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk