Re: [boost] Proposal: formal update review

From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-11 10:19:10

Pavel Vozenilek ha escrito:

> "Fernando Cacciola" wrote:
>
> > The very high quaility of boost libraries is due to the so-called BOOST
> > METHOD (I just coined the term, but how I like it :): the managed and
> > peer-reviewed acceptance process.
> >
>
> The very high quality is due to people who choose
> to hang out here and contribute.
>
> Bigger problem that API changes are abandoned
> libraries. A tool or a process helping to maintain
> these libraries is needed. Even visible
> marking of these libraries is missing.

I'd say library adopting should be encouraged: Maybe posting
a "Maintainer wanted for Boost.XXX" message would raise some
activity in this respect?

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo