Re: [boost] Proposal: formal update review

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-12 18:44:18

"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Effective and visible way to collect bug reports
> does not exist (I much appreciate the work
> of Marshal Clow but tool support is necessary, IMHO).

The SF tracker works, IMO, even if it's ugly.  I'd be happy to run a
Trac server for Boost, if that's preferred, but I don't know of a
_really_ compelling reason to switch.

> There's no way for people to contribute
> with small examples to amend the often
> insufficient documentation.

We're fixing that.  Rene's incipient site design allows that kind of
comment.  But anyway, what is this, a random list of complaints?

...snip more of the same...

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com