From: Silex (silex0r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-16 07:14:56
> Of course. If someone needs accurate timing under Windows that should work
> everywhere, QPC is probably not the way to go. So don't use e.g.
> boost::timer<performance_counter> in this case - roll your own.
Ok, for now I'll take for granted that the last implementation I just
proposed will be sufficient and that it'll use
boost::posix_time::microsec_clock for now. I'd like someone to confirm
this and possibly review the code so I can change whatever is
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk