From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-18 03:18:20
Beman Dawes wrote:
> With SVN, the distinction between a branch and a tag is blurred. They are
> both really just (virtual) copies at a given point in time. It is up to us
> exactly how we want to organize the releases we do.
> If I understand you correctly, you are pointing out that sometimes we may
> want an explicit bugfix branch of STABLE rather than just moving on to the
> next week's STABLE tag point. We can certainly do that if useful. At this
> point, I'm not sure we want to try to micro-manage those future decisions.
> Rather, we can just make adjustments as we gain experience.
This sounds reasonable. While it is unreasonable to waste resources on
things that just may be useful, but aren't necessary, I feel it is just
as important not to close the way in advance to exceptions to the main
strategy. From what you write I see this is not the case, so your
proposal is fine with me as it stands now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk