From: Asger Mangaard (tmb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-18 06:09:45
David Gruener wrote:
>>>I'm not sure what this utility is trying to address.
>>>The motivation is not to write down constructor, destructor, assignment
>>>and so on. But, unfortunately, you have to.
>> Why do you think that? No, you don't have to write a constructor,
> You have to, and you should read the pointers you are given.
> (here: The article with the grin pointer.)
>> Still I don't agree with you. Do you have an example to showcase this?
> Simple. Just try to use (create, detroy, copy...) a pimpled class
> with implicit defined functions somewhere else than in the implementation
Could you please provide an example? I don't see your point when I'm
providing code and examples that does what you claim it can't.
Maybe I'm missing something?
Could I add; I'm not in any way trying to be rude, I'm just trying to
understand your points.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk