Re: [boost] [review][pimpl_ptr] Pimpl Pointer review begins

From: Asger Mangaard (tmb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-18 06:09:45

David Gruener wrote:
>>>I'm not sure what this utility is trying to address.
>>>The motivation is not to write down constructor, destructor, assignment
>>>operator
>>>and so on. But, unfortunately, you have to.
>>
>> Why do you think that? No, you don't have to write a constructor,
>
> You have to, and you should read the pointers you are given.
> (here: The article with the grin pointer.)
>
>> Still I don't agree with you. Do you have an example to showcase this?
>
> Simple. Just try to use (create, detroy, copy...) a pimpled class
> with implicit defined functions somewhere else than in the implementation
> file.

Could you please provide an example? I don't see your point when I'm
providing code and examples that does what you claim it can't.

Maybe I'm missing something?

Could I add; I'm not in any way trying to be rude, I'm just trying to
understand your points.

Regards,
Asger