From: Michael Goldshteyn (mgoldshteyn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-18 17:24:54
Is there a reason why the prototype for noncopyable's operator= is improper.
const noncopyable& operator=( const noncopyable& );
noncopyable& operator=( const noncopyable& );
Also, shouldn't the destructor really be virtual?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk