From: Shunsuke Sogame (mb2act_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-20 12:47:17
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
>> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>> Shunsuke Sogame wrote:
>>>> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>>> FWIW, after combating Range and FOREACH,
>>>> my qualityless ranges are here: http://tinyurl.com/lebuq
>>> I can see you have picked up on the idea of range adaptors
>>> which I'm also baking. I'll definitely have a look.
>> Rightly or wrongly, temporary container of iterators
>> seems to increase range adaptor candidates.
>> Actually 'sort_range/sorted' becomes essential part of my code.
> are these it different from in-place sorting?
'sorted' doesn't modify its left argument, instead
it creates and sorts temporary container of iterators.
I don't know for sure whether such adaptor is legal or not.
>>> And btw, wasn't it you who made some MFC implementation of ranges?
>>> With your permission, I would like to include that in the
>> Though it was interesting work,
>> I have never used them except for CSimpleArray. :-(
>> I did think they were legacy and unrecommended while implementing.
>> They are now sleeping here... http://tinyurl.com/qucoa
> Ok, there would need to be some test along with these, other wise
> I can't include them.
> Another question is: does it work with vc6+, vc7+, or vc7.1+ ?
I guess Boost.Range non-intrusive customization
doesn't support vc6/7.
I will try to simplify the header structure and move them
to boost/range/detail/mfc. I can maybe... promise, if they
are really wanted. :-(
Apart from mfc, I think users (and I) hope some runtime test
functions are written by professionals (like range/concepts.hpp)
-- Shunsuke Sogame
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk