From: Martin Bonner (martin.bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 06:25:34
Gerhard Wesp Sent:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:41:32PM +0200, Maarten Kronenburg wrote:
>> Users can implement an unsigned_integer by deriving from
>> integer, but this will not give any performance gain.
> This would violate Item 32 in Effective C++, 3rd ed. by Scott Meyers:
> Make sure public inheritance models "is-a".
I agree it's not a good idea.
> I suggest deriving from integer be disallowed in the TR2 proposal.
... however I don't think that is. If C++ had "final", then it could be
compile time checked. As it is, I don't think TR2 could do more than
make it undefined behaviour. We really don't want more undefined
behaviour in C++ if we can avoid it. What is more, deriving from
integer would actually work on all implementations (as far as public
inheritance which doesn't model "is-a" works).
-- Martin Bonner Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden] Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ, ENGLAND Tel: +44 (0)1223 203894
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk