Boost logo

Boost :

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 23:57:29

Martin Bonner wrote:
> What Neal wrote is perfectly legal. See 5.7 para 4 in the standard:
> "For the purposes of these operators [+ and -], a pointer to a nonarray
> object behaves the same as a pointer to the first element of an array of
> length one with the type of the object as its element type."

I knew I must have missed something. Thanks for the pointer.

crawling-under-a-rock-ly yours


Thomas Witt

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at