Re: [boost] Problem with range?

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-26 23:57:29

Martin Bonner wrote:
> 
> What Neal wrote is perfectly legal.  See 5.7 para 4 in the standard:  
> "For the purposes of these operators [+ and -], a pointer to a nonarray
> object behaves the same as a pointer to the first element of an array of
> length one with the type of the object as its element type."
> 

I knew I must have missed something. Thanks for the pointer.

crawling-under-a-rock-ly yours

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]