From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-28 07:11:51
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
>In other words, if you can
>"infinitely" extend given positive number towards +inifnity, does it make any
>sense to disallow its extension past zero? It makes me think that concept of
>"unsigned integer with infinite precision" is self-contradictory.
No, it's not. Precision and signedness have nothing to do with each
other. The main (only, really, when it comes down to it) difference
between a signed and an unsigned integer is that an unsigned integer is
defined never to have a value less than 0. There are very valid reasons
to enforce such a restriction, even when you want no upper limit (the
term infinite precision is not really appropriate for integers).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk