From: Gerhard Wesp (gwesp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-29 11:32:27
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> One for the infinite group of integers, and a templated one
> (so basically, infinite number of types) for the finite groups.
This has limited usefulness. The more common applications of finite
groups (crypto...) require moduli
- well beyond of what's possible as a numeric template parameter and
- determined at runtime.
> and 'unsigned_integer' for the finite group (with a static
> method to set the modulo). The only thing I disagree with
Aaah, so I got this wrong all the time. I thought Maarten's
unsigned_integer should be, well, an unsigned integer, without a
modulus involved. So it should represent Z_p? Maarten, can you
-- Gerhard Wesp ZRH office voice: +41 (0)44 668 1878 ZRH office fax: +41 (0)44 200 1818 For the rest I claim that raw pointers must be abolished.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk