Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-06 12:48:29

On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:24:58 -0700, Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>Gennaro Prota wrote:
>> [...]
>> Hi guys,
>> should I assume that previous CodeWarrior versions are definitely
>> unsupported? If so, we could simplify a lot the code for
>This is up to the individual library author. Personally I think throwing
>out support just for the sake of getting rid of BOOST_WORKAROUND is a
>bad idea. The story is different if you have to make changes to the code
>That being said the RC_1_34_0 branch is definitely closed for changes
>like this.

There was a misunderstanding :) I didn't mean to eliminate usages of
BOOST_WORKAROUND. Just to simplify *its* implementation (see


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at