From: David Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-07 17:11:57
Andy Little wrote:
> "David Greene" wrote
>>I agree, but unfortunately it is not general enough. See my review
>>concerning the lack of non-power-of-10 prefixes. I think this
>>library _should_ be a general units framework but it's not there
>>yet. Until it gets there or there is a plan to get there, it should
>>not be called "units."
> This is theoretically fine.
> In practise I have a very long list of things to do just within the SI
> framework. Something has to be low priority and because this is well outside the
> current scope of the library, non-decimal prefixes is probably going to be low
> priority unfortunately.
Do you see a clear path to getting there? If so, perhaps others would
be able to work on it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk