From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-08 09:22:22
Pavol Droba wrote:
> Range interface has been changed, but only in the CVS_HEAD.
Ok, noting that in my version I have not taken the updated range for at
least a couple months and there's a huge list of range files that need
>1_34 branch should be consistent.
With what, 1.33.1? It's clearly different.
>The regression test for string_algo library are passing
> as well.
Sure -- I can't explain the success of the regression tests.
> I would check, you your code does not use mixed versions of boot..
I've tested with multiple versions of boost on my machine for years, but
I triple checked before I posted.
> cd ~/devTools/boost_rc_1_34/libs/date_time/test
> cd ~/devTools/boost_cvs/libs/date_time/test
> cd ~/devTools/boost_1_33_1/libs/date_time/test
I don't think it's possible for bjam to be confused about what it is
pointing to (and note that there's no BOOST_ROOT set). To be sure I
compiled a small date-time test case using g++ -I to switch the include,
diffed the date-time, string algo, range directories, etc.
And then there's this in the output pointing squarely at my RC version.
error: âconst char*â is not a class, struct, or union type
function âvoid boost::algorithm::replace_all(SequenceT&, const Range1T&,
const Range2T&) [with SequenceT = std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, Range1T = const char*,
Range2T = std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk