Re: [boost] [Review][PQS] Review ends

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-11 02:56:50

"me22" wrote
> On 6/10/06, Andy Little <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> OK, but  they are define a  rotation in 3D space, do they not ?
>>
> My understanding is that a *unit* quaternion can be used to represent
> a rotation in 3-space, but an arbitrary quaternion is 4D.

OK. So going back to the original point. The intent in PQS is to use a 
quaternion solely for representing a rotation in 3D space. Putting quaternion in 
a 3D namespace makes sense to me from that viewpoint and should help to clarify 
its intended purpose.

regards
Andy Little