Re: [boost] Boost.Test - misc observations

From: Johan Nilsson (r.johan.nilsson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-14 02:31:05

Paul A Bristow wrote:
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>>  [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Robert Ramey
>>  Sent: 13 June 2006 18:13

[snip]

>>
>>  I don't dispute that UTF is better.  Its just that sometimes
>>  I want to make
>>  a test and I can't build the boost libraries without taking
>>  a big detour into bjam country.
>
> Surely this isn't true now that Dave's Merry Men have produced a
> Idiot-proof (well I did it OK) way of downloading pre-built
> libraries, including Boost.Test.

Actually, it's not included - at least not the last time I tried (which is 
only a few minutes ago).

I've only tried the Dublin and Ishikawa mirrors though, could there be a 
difference?

// Johan