From: Victor A. Wagner Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-17 12:40:31
At 12:14 2006-06-15, John Maddock wrote:
>David Abrahams wrote:
> > a. I don't think you're actually agreeing with me. Maybe
> > s/carefully/seriously/?
> > b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
> > the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
>I missed (well forgot actually) that the compiler was non-comforming
"in that mode"
in which "mode" ??
, I guess it's not quite non-conforming enough to cause problems for
>most people, although I agree that the performance issue is a very real one.
>The suggestion to provide a Boost.Build option for this sounds like the best
>approach though? Anyone want to provide a patch?
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk