Re: [boost] Low-level precision timer proposal

From: Brannon King (brannonking_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-17 17:20:37

For whatever datatype the "elapsed" function returns, I think we had 
better have istream/ostream overloads for it. The current one returns 
"double", which works fine with istream/ostream. The overload should 
return or parse secs.fracsecs in all various forms.

Silex wrote:
> Hello
>
> Here attached is the latest version of the boost::timer modification.
>
> About doing the documentation I must say that QuickBook & BoostBook
> confused me. I understand QuickBook generates BoostBook's
> documentation but how to use it ?
>
> At the moment I'm only doing the documentation in a plain text file
> waiting for your answers...
> I *think* I understood that I'm supposed to write a .qbk file, but how
> to then make Spirit generate the xml for BoostBook is beyond me, I'm
> not used to Spirit yet.
>
> Thank you for your help
> Philippe
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost