From: Gerhard Wesp (gwesp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-19 06:13:09
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:04:21AM +0200, Matthias Troyer wrote:
> As a physicist I am completely baffled and confused. What do you mean
> by rank of a quantity? Do you mean the size of a vector/matrix? If
I understood Olegs post about rank such that it was something that would
allow to distinguish energy from torque, e.g. Is there such a thing?
Off the top of my head, I cannot think of a situation where you might
want to add energy to torque, even if in the SI system they have the
same dimension (Nm).
Same thing for angular velocity [rad/s] and frequency (1/s). You
probably don't want to add both, even if in SI they're both in s^-1. Is
this maybe a deficiency of SI? Would it make sense to add the unit
"radians" that is used colloquially anyway, to the system?
-- Gerhard Wesp ZRH office voice: +41 (0)44 668 1878 ZRH office fax: +41 (0)44 200 1818 For the rest I claim that raw pointers must be abolished.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk