From: Stephan Tolksdorf (andorxor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-19 14:50:00
>> Not being an expert on
>> min/max macro issues, I wonder if this is necessary, or if the macro
>> could be prevented from leaking to user code (without the user defining
> I am not quite sure what you are complaining about. Boost.Test doesn't
> define these macro nor it could undefine them. If you do not want to be
> exposed to system level headers use offline component.
The question basically was, if the macros could be automatically
undefined after the inclusion of the windows headers in case they
weren't defined in beforehand (or alternatively, if NOMINMAX could be
selectively defined for the implementation of Boost.Test).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk