Re: [boost] [PQS] Length::m vs Length - which is better - examples?

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-19 16:53:43

"Janek Kozicki" <janek_listy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:20060618012325.13991239_at_absurd...
> Andy Little said:     (by the date of Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:14:57 +0100)
>> Some examples there showing the advantages of units are:
>>
>> <libs/pqs/examples/conversion_factor.cpp>
>> <libs/pqs/examples/capacitor_time_curve.cpp>
>> <libs/pqs/examples/lab_example.cpp>
>> <libs/pqs/examples/gravity.cpp>
>> <libs/pqs/examples/fibonacci_optimise-timer.cpp>
>> <libs.pqs/examples/noise_voltage_density.cpp.
>> <libs/pqs/examples/clcpp_response.cpp>
>
>
> Hi Andy, this is not a good reply to well posed question.
>
> You should rather pick only one of those examples, copy/paste a (small)
> fragment of it, and write reasoning why length::m makes sense. It's even
> possible that while writing this, you will discover yourself that it doesn't
> make sense :)
>
> I'm sorry about being harsh ... but - you know small piece of code with
> good comments that are ,,on topic'' of length::m is thousands better
> than tons of examples without explanation...

Yes the examples need to be sorted to and linked to Docs, and more examples...

Ok .........  ;-)

regards
Andy Little