Re: [boost] [PQS] Vector/matrix library with mixed units vs. underlying data type

From: Leland Brown (lelandbrown_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-20 04:17:16

--- Janek Kozicki <janek_listy_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I have read you whole post, and I totally agree (it
> was an interesting
> example too!). I think there was a misunderstanding.
> 
> The problem is about underlying data type. Do we
> allow one field of a
> vector<3> to be double, another field to be int, and
> another field to be Boost.Rational ?
> 
> Please see my direct reply to Michael, titled
> "Re: [boost] [PQS] free_quantity contra int,double
> and Boost.Rational"

Ok, yes, I see the misunderstanding now.  I agree - I
don't see a need to mix the underlying numeric types.

-- Leland

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com