From: Leland Brown (lelandbrown_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-20 04:17:16
--- Janek Kozicki <janek_listy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I have read you whole post, and I totally agree (it
> was an interesting
> example too!). I think there was a misunderstanding.
> The problem is about underlying data type. Do we
> allow one field of a
> vector<3> to be double, another field to be int, and
> another field to be Boost.Rational ?
> Please see my direct reply to Michael, titled
> "Re: [boost] [PQS] free_quantity contra int,double
> and Boost.Rational"
Ok, yes, I see the misunderstanding now. I agree - I
don't see a need to mix the underlying numeric types.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk