Re: [boost] is_specialization in Boost.Traits?

From: Nicolas Fleury (nidoizo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-28 12:16:17

David Abrahams wrote:
> Nicolas Fleury <nidoizo_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> See boost/detail/is_xxx.hpp
>>>
>> That's perfect, thx.  Is that something we want to add to the 
>> documentation and move out of detail?
> 
> As Tonto said in the old joke, "who's `we,' white man?"
> 

After looking more at it, I think Matt Calabrese implementation is 
better, since it would support also integers as template arguments.  I 
also think it's better for something not in detail to not add 
automatically the is_ prefix.

Regards,
Nicolas