From: Jeremy Day (jeremy.day_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-29 12:37:11
Greetings, everyone. This is my first time posting here, so if I screw this
up, please bear with me.
On 6/29/06, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I afraid I still don't know the rule as to when you need to provide a
> throw() specifier rather than just documenting that a function never
> Is there guidance from exception experts?
I have spoken with Bjarne Stroustrup about this (access to "the man" is one
of the benefits of living near Texas A&M University), and he is of the
opinion that exception specifications are never reliable and should not be
used, as they give programmers a false sense of security. Thus, exception
guarantees should be documented in comments (or in some other variety of
documentation), rather than through throw() specifications.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk