From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-29 15:54:23
Beman Dawes wrote:
> <Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> shouldn't system_error::const char * what() const contain throw ()?
> Good question. I don't know the answer. The standard (for
> std::exception, which is the eventual base class) says:
> virtual const char* what() const throw();
> system_error::what catches exceptions, so it never throws.
> I afraid I still don't know the rule as to when you need to provide a
> throw() specifier rather than just documenting that a function never
You can't relax an exception specification in an overrider, only tighten it,
so yes, system_error::what() needs throw(). I believe that a conforming
compiler will reject it without the throw() specification.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk