From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-01 17:45:30
I'm a bit puzzled by the failure of the compose_test test, which shows
up in the current Metacomm results. I'm using BBv1 for running my tests,
while I would guess that the Metacomm people are using BBv2. Still the
generated command lines appear very similar, the only differences being
the use of absolute paths and the explicit reference to the standard
include directory in the Metacomm command line.
I wonder if there's any configuration mismatch, like the use of
different kinds of libraries (e.g. static vs. dynamic?).
I'm checking to see if there are other diverging results. It would be
interesting to know what other Borland users get from running the tests.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk