From: David Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-03 18:09:23
Doug Gregor wrote:
> I think implementations of common parallel architectural patterns
> would make an excellent library on top of Boost.MPI (or asio, or
> threads, or all 3), but I'd say it's out of scope for Boost.MPI itself.
I agree with this. I'm interested in such things and it would be
great to get a library that can operate with a variety of
communication mechanisms (MPI, UPC(++?), etc.).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk