Re: [boost] Interest in super string class?

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-04 17:46:03

AlisdairM wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
> 
>> Now lets examine the hastily created *pre-alpha* super_string docs:
>>
>> template<class char_type>
>> void basic_super_string< char_type >::replace_all_regex(
>>                  const base_string_type &  	match_regex,
>> 		const base_string_type &  	replace_format)  	
> 
> OK, now I 'get it'.  Until this example I simply saw functions moving
> from one interface into another - now I see that the interface itself
> becomes cleaner.
 >
> Move me from 'skeptic' to 'believer', although I still can't help
> feeling dirty for endorsing this!  

LOL :-)  Thanks for opening up...

> Some dogma just runs too deep to easily walk away from I guess.

Believe me, I had to think about this for awhile before posting it.  I figured 
I'd be sealing my fate with some people on this list for good.  And I knew the 
'less generic' == good was going to be hard to sell ;-)

Jeff