From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-06 02:32:05
Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> But it might be not: the question of what the result of
>> to_upper(to_lower(to_upper(rng))) is supposed to be is not trivial at
> The result will be a view. Then, if it's done correctly, ideally,
> the view transformations can collapse the view. IOTW, this:
> to_lower_view<to_upper_view<range> >
> will be optimized to:
Hmm, I'm not convinced of that.
would return something different than
in languages which do not have a homomorphous characterwise mapping
between lowercase and uppercase spelling (e.g. german: ß -> SS, but S
-> s). For the same reason, a locale-aware to_upper_view would not be as
trivial as one would think at first. (Not overly complex, either, probably).
The collapsing views would produce a better quality output in the case
of ß, but I'm not sure the behaviour of compiletime composition
should differ from the behaviour of the runtime composition.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk