From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-09 17:26:04
John Maddock wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> * Someone like me that doesn't pay the necessary attention can
>> inadvertently "fix" something that doesn't need fixing.
Well, for what it's worth, test_bind_tricky _is_ passing for g++ 4.1.1 now.
:-) And so is test_function_tricky, for different reasons. However,
test_boost seems to have started failing, presumably because I added an
#include <functional> to boost/function.hpp to bring in unary_function and
binary_function and this probably created a header loop. Any ideas on how we
might fix that?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk