Re: [boost] tr1/test_function_tricky trickier than needed

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-09 17:26:04

John Maddock wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:

>> * Someone like me that doesn't pay the necessary attention can
>> inadvertently "fix" something that doesn't need fixing.
>
> :-)

Well, for what it's worth, test_bind_tricky _is_ passing for g++ 4.1.1 now. 
:-) And so is test_function_tricky, for different reasons. However, 
test_boost seems to have started failing, presumably because I added an 
#include <functional> to boost/function.hpp to bring in unary_function and 
binary_function and this probably created a header loop. Any ideas on how we 
might fix that?