Re: [boost] Interest in Barton-Nackman's fallible<T>?

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-10 10:43:20

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:50:20 +0200, Simon Richter
<Simon.Richter_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>>     T    m_value;
>
>That means that T needs to be default-constructible, which for more 
>complex types T means that T needs to be capable of knowing whether it 
>is in an uninitialized state, which kind of makes this class pretty 
>pointless.

Care to submit an example before being so categorical?

--
[ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]
[    resume:  available on request      ]