From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-12 05:28:13
Peter Dimov wrote:
> ... but I committed a "speculative" fix nonetheless. I also fixed
Confirmed: both gcc and Borland are passing those tests now. Can you push
those changes onto the release branch as well? Many thanks!
> As for there being no easy way... of course there is,
> add boost.tr1 to the include path; use #include <tr1/functional>
> instead. Yes, yes, I know, <functional> is what TR1 says. But -
> having the benefit of hindsight - we can now say with almost 100%
> certainty that TR1 is wrong, wrong, and wrong, in that order. :-)
Ah, the old:
"if you want to get to there, don't start from here"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk