Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-12 05:28:13

Peter Dimov wrote:
> ... but I committed a "speculative" fix nonetheless. I also fixed
> function.hpp.

Confirmed: both gcc and Borland are passing those tests now. Can you push
those changes onto the release branch as well? Many thanks!

> As for there being no easy way... of course there is,
> never
> add boost.tr1 to the include path; use #include <tr1/functional>
> instead. Yes, yes, I know, <functional> is what TR1 says. But -
> having the benefit of hindsight - we can now say with almost 100%
> certainty that TR1 is wrong, wrong, and wrong, in that order. :-)

Ah, the old:

"if you want to get to there, don't start from here"

trick :-)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at