Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-12 12:10:48

Next message: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [Boost-bugs] [ boost-Bugs-1520617 ] Memoryleakwhenusing boost::thread and boost::test together"
Previous message: Pavel Vozenilek: "Re: [boost] new library proposition : lisp interpreter library"
In reply to: Deane Yang: "Re: [boost] [math/staticstics/design] How best to namestatisticalfunctions?"
Next in thread: Topher Cooper: "Re: [boost] [math/staticstics/design] How best to namestatisticalfunctions?"

I think here you may need to revert back to using those "cryptic"
| suffixes. Since the possibilities are pretty limited, they won't be
| quite so cryptic anymore. So maybe something like
| "probability_c" for complementary cdf?

I've just lost some hair discovering a down-side of the neat _c - it is easy
to forget/not notice it. Doh!

So there is some benefit in a longer name.

Paul

---
Paul A Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
+44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS
pbristow_at_[hidden]

Next message: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [Boost-bugs] [ boost-Bugs-1520617 ] Memoryleakwhenusing boost::thread and boost::test together"
Previous message: Pavel Vozenilek: "Re: [boost] new library proposition : lisp interpreter library"
In reply to: Deane Yang: "Re: [boost] [math/staticstics/design] How best to namestatisticalfunctions?"
Next in thread: Topher Cooper: "Re: [boost] [math/staticstics/design] How best to namestatisticalfunctions?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk