Re: [boost] [math/staticstics/design] How besttonamestatisticalfunctions?

From: Paul A Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-14 06:10:23

|  -----Original Message-----
|  From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
|  [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Paul A Bristow
|  Sent: 13 July 2006 17:40
|  To: boost_at_[hidden]
|  Subject: Re: [boost] [math/staticstics/design] How 
|  besttonamestatisticalfunctions?
Sorry I forgot the attachment.

Paul|  

|  I've quickly knocked up a very rough sketch of how it might 
|  look like this
|  (attached a zip of a .cpp run on MSVC 8.0)
|  
|  I'm sure you can suggest improvements to this.
|  
|  Seeing it used makes my still quite like a single function name
|  'probability' (with 1 parameter for pdf and two for cdf(s)) 
|  but I am willing
|  to be out-voted.  Neat but riskier.
|  
|  I also attached a response from Daniel Egloff making a 
|  similar, but more
|  advanced proposal.
|  
|  (as John notes, the downside with a class is difficulty of 
|  extension).
|  
|  However, I am just about to go on holiday for two weeks, so 
|  I will leave you
|  all to discuss further, and hope you've got everything 
|  sorted out and an
|  example code written by the time I get back ;-))
|  
|  Thanks
|  
|  Paul
|  
|  ---
|  Paul A Bristow
|  Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB
|  [phone] & SMS, Mobile [phone] & SMS
|  pbristow_at_[hidden]
|  
|   
|  
|  
|