From: Martin Slater (mslater_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-16 23:08:28
> frequency adjustments, such as performed via SpeedStep, are not. But
> it's just a first cut. And then, I don't think one would want to use
> these facilities with SpeedStep in the way.
I think it should at least detect SpeedStep and fail or fall back to a
possibly lower precision but stable timer. IMO without this its unusable
except for very basic performance tests.
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/389 - Release Date: 14/07/2006
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk