Re: [boost] [config] Last call for choosing macro names

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-17 22:42:08

David Abrahams wrote:
> Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:46:25 -0400, David Abrahams
>> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>    BOOST_WORKAROUND(CXX_GCC, VERSION <= (3)(4))
>>>> That's nice :) You know, I like it as much as you do, but I'd rather
>>>> be safe than sorry. What about the approach proposed by Joaquin?
>>> Please be specific; I don't know what he proposed.
>> I guess you've seen his message by the time I write this. Anyway,
>> here's a link:
>>
>>  <http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2006/07/107917.php>
> 
> Seems like it creates more churn than necessary, but I don't care all
> that much.

And it requires that it be done after the 1.34 release. As otherwise it 
would be very difficult to do merging as the number of diffs would be 
large and difficult to track.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo