From: Martin Bonner (martin.bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-18 08:58:54
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennaro Prota Sent:
18 July 2006 13:47 To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:39:42 +0100, Anthony Williams
> <anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> boostinspect:notbooststandardlicense ?
>> Looks good to me, though it might look better with underscores, as
>> per the usual boost naming:
> I don't care that much (my only preference is for the tag to appear at
> the bottom of the file), but the 's' in "BSL" stands for "software",
> not "standard". Just let me know what your choice is, so that I can
> make the tool aware of it :)
- I agree it should not say "nolicense" that is too confusing for the
- It probably shouldn't say "not_boost_license" because the license must
meet the boost license requirements
- boostinspect:not_boost_software_license is probably best.
Why do you think the tag should be at the end. Surely next to the
actual license would be best?
-- Martin Bonner Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden] Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ, ENGLAND Tel: +44 (0)1223 203894
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk