Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification (2006-07-16/RC_1_34_0)

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-18 09:42:51

Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:39:42 +0100, Anthony Williams
> <anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>> boostinspect:notbooststandardlicense ?
>>
>>Looks good to me, though it might look better with underscores, as per the
>>usual boost naming:
>>
>>    boostinspect:not_boost_standard_license
>
> I don't care that much (my only preference is for the tag to appear at
> the bottom of the file), but the 's' in "BSL" stands for "software",
> not "standard". Just let me know what your choice is, so that I can
> make the tool aware of it :)

boostinspect:not_boost_software_license works for me. I figured that Martin
meant "not standard", as in "not the normal boost license".

Why your preference for the bottom of the file?

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Williams
Software Developer
Just Software Solutions Ltd
http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk