Re: [boost] Boost inspection notification (2006-07-18/RC_1_34_0) *X*

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-18 21:17:11

Eric Niebler wrote:
> Gennaro Prota wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:57:52 -0700, "Eric Niebler"
>> <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>> |foreach|
>>>>   libs/foreach/index.html:
>>>>     *A* broken link: ../../doc/html/foreach.html
>>> This is not a broken link, but a redirect to a file that will be 
>>> generated when the docs are built. So, I should put 
>>> "boostinspect:nolink" somewhere in this file, and the problem will go 
>>> away, is that right?
>> Yes, but beware that, then, *no link* in that file is checked.
>> Hopefully inspect tools technology will improve with time :-)
>>
> 
> 
> As I expect that this problem (links to auto-generated documentation) is 
> a common one, and likely to become more common, might I suggest a 
> difference solution? Rene, why don't you build the docs *first* and then 
> run the inspect tool? Presumably then this would not appear as a broken 
> link.

Yep, I thought about that :-) I don't think I'll have time this week to 
investigate doing that on the Boost server though. It's a bit more work 
to set up and may fairly complicated if the required software is not 
already installed in it.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo