From: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-20 02:03:08
Gennaro Prota ha escrito:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:54:32 +0200, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz
> <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >I've inspected iostreams code base and the lib does not
> >have a centralized header for this kind of hacks, yet there are several
> >other BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE scattered on the places of
> >usage, so I decided to keep that style and put the using in positioning.hpp
> >Does this look OK to you? Any other objection to my commiting
> >this new diff?
> Hi Joaquín,
> thanks for analyzing the issue.
Unless we all begin chasing red cells down we will never get 1.34
out of the door.
> Yes, that looks ok to me (off-hand I
> can't see where <cstdio> gets included, but I hope it is!).
I thought the same, but regression tests show that the stuff is indeed
included, so I decided not to touch the code any more than strictly
> I'd say
> just go with it. :-)
Done. Best regards,
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
> [ Gennaro Prota, C++ developer for hire ]
> [ resume: available on request ]
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk