Re: [boost] Ace??? (was: ANN: POCO - C++ Portable Components)

From: Steven Burns (royalstream_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 17:18:05

POCO's documentation is fine, sometimes a method could deserve more 
explanation but it's still fine given the fact most of the classes are very 
intuitive.
Boost documentation is usually excellent, which is mandatory because some 
classes are not intuitive at first sight.
ACE's website is simply unfriendly and looks careless.

"Sohail Somani" <s.somani_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:1C1EBEF8DBACDC439D038EA051674EC735BD9E_at_xbox.financialcad.com...
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of val salamakha
>>
>> Look at Chapter 5 "The ACE Service Configurator Framework" in
>> "C++ Network Programming" v2 of D. Schmidt . The chapter is
>> about the subject of your discussion and explains how it works.
>
> I have yet to understand why I need to buy a textbook to use ACE. Tthe
> website is not that good. Not nearly as good as boost.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>