Re: [boost] Ace??? (was: ANN: POCO - C++ Portable Components)

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 17:35:02

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Patrick
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 2:29 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Ace??? (was: ANN: POCO - C++ Portable Components)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Steven Burns
> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 5:18 PM
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: Re: [boost] Ace??? (was: ANN: POCO - C++ Portable 
> Components)
> > 
> > POCO's documentation is fine, sometimes a method could 
> > deserve more explanation but it's still fine given the fact 
> > most of the classes are very intuitive.
> > Boost documentation is usually excellent, which is mandatory 
> > because some classes are not intuitive at first sight.
> > ACE's website is simply unfriendly and looks careless.
> 
> Poco's documentation is 'ok', but the fact that the comments for all
> methods are *below* the method declarations is a style disaster.
[snip]

Boost docs > *

But seriously, I think more libraries documented like boost would be
great :)