Re: [boost] is_nan

From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 09:09:30

John Maddock wrote:
> Johan Råde wrote:
>> So it would make sense to have the functions
>>
>>    is_finite()
>>    is_normal()
>>    is_subnormal()
>>
>>    is_infinity()
>>    is_plus_infinity()
>>    is_minus_infinity()
>>
>>    is_nan()
> 
> Do we really want to use gratuitously different names from those in C99:
> 
> isfinite
> isnorm
> isinf
> isnan
> 
> ?
> 

Probably not. I was just ignorant about C99, and tried to put together 
Boost style names. Lets stick with the C99 names then.

When will you submit your implementations of isnan etc to Boost?

--Johan Råde